Skip to main content

#Kane4Hart - My Case for the Hart (MVP) Trophy



CHICAGO, IL -- Well, folks, we are nearing the end of the 2018-19 regular season.

It's really mind-blowing how fast time's gone--there are just fifteen games left for the Blackhawks to try and fight their way back into the playoffs.

But, that's not really what we're here to talk about today. We're going to talk about the one player the Hawks have desperately needed this season to produce, and the one player who went above and beyond to do so.

We're talking about Patrick Kane, in case there was any confusion.

As we near the end of the season, NHL awards talk seems to pop up on my Twitter timeline more and more frequently. There are talks of the Norris (best defenseman), the Vezina (best goaltender), the Jack Adams (best coach), etc. The one that's talked about the most frequently, usually, is the Hart Trophy--aka, the MVP trophy.

There are a lot people arguing that Nikita Kucherov of Tampa Bay Lightning royalty should be a shoo-in for the Hart this season. And, look, I'm not going to sit here and say that his 100+ points aren't good, or that he's not deserving. Dude is fully deserving of this trophy, but I think there might be a better candidate in Patrick Kane.

Same could be said for Connor McDavid--he's pulling his Edmonton Oilers team towards a playoff spot, too, doing Connor McDavid things to try and save his lackluster team. I still think, though, he doesn't beat out Kane for this one.

Hear me out.

Without Patrick Kane, the Blackhawks would be stuck at the very, very bottom of the league. That's not to say that Jonathan Toews, or Alex DeBrincat or Dylan Strome don't do anything--they (and like, half of the rest of the team) contribute a lot, too. But, without Kane, you don't get to sit in a playoff spot for 45 minutes after the rough November and December they had. You don't go on a seven-game winning streak, beating teams no one thought you'd beat.

Kane went on a 20-game point streak, people. Twenty games. That's not a fluke, that's not an accidental streak. That is the result of a player who shows up for his team to get them the two points in any way he can.

Even just last night against Buffalo, he passed Steve Larmer in career points--moving to fourth overall in the franchise with 924. Did I mention he did it in back-to-back shifts?

That's the thing about Kane--he may not score every single night (not everyone can be Wayne Gretzky, okay?), but he is able to create chances for his teammates and give this team their best shot at winning games right now. Without Kane, those crazy good passes and tips don't happen.

On top of that, look at the numbers--he's on pace to beat his career high 106 points (his 2015-16 year that won him... wait for it... the Hart Trophy), sitting at 40 goals and 56 assists for 96 points with 15 games yet to play. He's currently second in points and third in the league in goals, so yeah, the numbers also show that he's pretty damn good.

That's why I think he really should be the league MVP. Yes, there are other guys on other teams who are more skilled or do just as good of a job. Let's look at Kucherov for a second again, just to really drive this home. In the case of Kucherov, the Lightning, I'm convinced, would be just fine on star-power without him in the lineup. I guarantee you they'd still be in first place. Maybe not by as large a margin, but you can't tell me that Steven Stamkos, Victor Hedman, Andrei Vasilievsky, Brayden Point, Ryan McDonagh, et al. couldn't find ways to win without Kucherov. That team is loaded.

Or, look at McDavid. Sure, the Oilers are a dumpster fire--we're all aware of that. The only other player on the ice who maybe could match McDavid would maybe be Leon Draisaitl, and I'm hesitant to even say he could match him. But, I'm not convinced that the Oilers would do much differently than they're playing now--McDavid was suspended for two games, and the Oilers played just fine without him. I know it's a small sample size, being just two games, but they beat a deflated Anaheim team, and they lost to Nashville in a shootout--I wouldn't argue with 3 out of 4 possible points there.

The Hawks, on the other hand, lost Kane to illness earlier this season, and were complete routed by an inconsistent Vancouver team. It was actually the last nail in the coffin before Coach Quenneville was fired, which is a whole different can of worms, but worth mentioning. Needless to say, they looked terrible without him.

All of this is to say that even if you ignore the numbers, Patrick Kane means the world and more to this team. He's thirty years old and still tearing it up out there shift after shift, because he is Patrick Kane. I'm convinced he's the best American player currently in the game, but I wouldn't necessarily disagree with you if you said he's making an argument to be the best American player ever in the sport if he ever reaches retirement.

So, I've done my part, now it's time for you to do yours--do you think Kane deserves the Hart this year? If you do, go tweet #Kane4Hart and let's see if we can get this thing trending. 

The Hawks have 9 points to make up in 15 games if they're going to make the dance, and midnight hasn't dawned on them just yet.

Are you in?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blackhawks Fire Assistant Coach Mike Kitchen

CHICAGO, IL -- GM Stan Bowman is keeping to his word about making changes, I guess. This may seem like a surprise to a lot of fans, but honestly, I can't say I'm overly surprised. Kitchen was mostly responsible for the power play and penalty-killing units. It's not an exaggeration to suggest that both units were more than disappointing this season--especially when it really mattered and they needed to be strong. But, Kitchen was a good assistant coach. He saw the last two Stanley Cups with the Blackhawks, starting after the 2009-2010 season with the Hawks. Up until this year, the penalty killing and power play has been stellar--but, obviously something changed. Still, I'm not sure anyone expected Bowman to make changes this quickly, or in this fashion. I think this likely sets the stage for what to expect this summer, which could be shocking to some fans this summer. I'm not even entirely sure who is safe on the roster or coaching staff (except Coach Q, w...

Measuring the Blackhawks Rookies and Newbies

CHICAGO, IL -- I know I did a quick measure of the entire Blackhawks roster back in February, but I thought since the season is likely coming to a close (save for a miracle), it might be nice to get an idea of where the newbies and rookies to the Hawks roster are. For this article, I did create some guidelines, like I did with the mid-season report cards (end of season report cards are coming soon, by the way!). This isn't really going to be a report card, but more of just my general thoughts on how the player is doing in his first season with the Hawks--I'll give a more specific/"graded" report in the post-season report cards article. The basic guidelines are as follows: Must be currently on the Hawks roster (not in Rockford) Must have played less than 82 NHL games OR less than 82 games with the Blackhawks (all stats will be just for this season to make things easy) Must be their first full year playing with the Blackhawks With that out of...

Checking In - Breaking Down the Blackhawks' Play Over a Month

CHICAGO, IL — I’m going to be absolutely real with you—I had no idea what to write about for the blog this week. I’ve written about the Blackhawks being good, bad, and everything in between, I’ve written about Patrick Kane a couple times now (#Kane4Hart), and I’ve even written about the best goal celebrations from the Hawks this season. The idea tank is running dry, my friends. So, I thought we could throw it back to a post I made a while back about what the Hawks really needed to do to make the playoffs, and grade them on how well they're meeting all three of those items a couple of weeks later. Let's just get right on into it, shall we? 1) With 27 games left, you have to go 18-9 to get to the 88-90-point range that would potentially get them into the playoffs. So, the Hawks currently sit at 71 points through 70 games, and since the date of this article (February 8th), the Hawks have gone 9-6, which is not terrible, but also only gives them a b...