Skip to main content

TRADE: F Nick Schmaltz to Arizona, F Dylan Strome and F Brendan Perlini to Chicago



CHICAGO, IL -- I'm a little disappointed, but not surprised.

 The whole Nick Schmaltz trade-talks thing has been poked around on both Twitter and in the hockey media circle, so I'm not overly surprised that he was dealt around 11pm EST last night.

 And, honestly, I don't really mind this trade, but we'll get to that in a second because I really need to get something off my chest first.

 Stan Bowman is really starting to piss me off.

 I know I'm not the only one who feels this way, and he even kind of addressed it in an interview with Scott Powers on The Athletic.

 But, I'm sorry--this 'win-now mentality' and 'we're 100% a playoff team as it stands' stuff the front office is spewing out is crap. See the below tweet from Mark Lazerus (The Athletic) this morning:

All we've heard from Bowman (and the front office, honestly) the past year or so has just felt like lies. I hate being this person, I hate putting blame on people, but this is just... not being transparent. I get that things change, but say that things are changing. Don't just make sweeping statements like the above and just sweep it under the rug when things go bad. This is what makes me not want to trust Bowman or the rest of the front office when they say things like 'we're committed to him' or 'he's not going anywhere.'

 I just don't understand how you say something like that and completely ignore it by trading away both Vinnie Hinostroza and Schmaltz--or even Ryan Hartman for that matter. These young guys were the future of the Hawks, and they were all traded away.

 Is it too much for me to ask that the Hawks front office (or any team's front office, for that matter) is just more... transparent? I know, obviously, that they aren't going to outright say 'we're trading everything!' but the least they can do is at least admit what's really going on, which isn't necessarily a rebuild, but more likely a retooling.

 They can't be in a win-now mindset at this point, and I'm really sick of hearing them say that. If they keep telling themselves that, they're not only lying to themselves, but to fans as well. 

 A win-now mentality means keeping Artemi Panarin. A win-now mentality means going for a stronger backup goalie over the summer (and no offense to Cam Ward--he's fine, but there were goalies like Philip Grubauer and potentially Sergei Bobrovsky on the market, too). A win-now mentality means trading for Erik Karlsson, who instead went to a conference rival. A win-now mentality isn't signing Chris Kunitz or Brandon Manning. A win-now mentality means doing more.

 Again, I try not to pin mistakes on one person or a group of people, but... it's hard not to here.

 Anyways, let's talk about the actual trade.

 At the end of the day, I really don't hate it. I like that we got two forwards from the trade, but I kind of wish we'd gotten a defensemen (not necessarily from Arizona, but just one in general). 

 I think in terms of comparing, all three of the players in this trade have struggled in the past year or so on their respective teams. It'll be interesting to see if any of them find it in a new city--sometimes all it does take is just a change of scenery.

 Right off the bat, there are a couple of positives on the Chicago side--both Strome and Perlini have about 40 shots on goal (SOG) this season, compared to Schmaltz's 33. I think Perlini and Strome both have potential: Strome was selected third overall in the 2015 draft by Arizona, just behind Connor McDavid and Jack Eichel; Perlini was the 12th overall pick in the 2014 draft. Strome won the OHL Cup in the 2016-17 season (with none other than Alex DeBrincat, mind you), so I think both players have potential that young-gun Coach Jeremy Colliton might be able to unlock.

 I'm not ready to write them off yet, so I think Hawks fans should give both Strome and Perlini chances in Chicago. Not saying we need to assume that they're going to be amazing, but just keep in mind what they've shown in the past.

 I'm still all in, despite everything that's transpired this season. Are you?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Checking In - Breaking Down the Blackhawks' Play Over a Month

CHICAGO, IL — I’m going to be absolutely real with you—I had no idea what to write about for the blog this week. I’ve written about the Blackhawks being good, bad, and everything in between, I’ve written about Patrick Kane a couple times now (#Kane4Hart), and I’ve even written about the best goal celebrations from the Hawks this season. The idea tank is running dry, my friends. So, I thought we could throw it back to a post I made a while back about what the Hawks really needed to do to make the playoffs, and grade them on how well they're meeting all three of those items a couple of weeks later. Let's just get right on into it, shall we? 1) With 27 games left, you have to go 18-9 to get to the 88-90-point range that would potentially get them into the playoffs. So, the Hawks currently sit at 71 points through 70 games, and since the date of this article (February 8th), the Hawks have gone 9-6, which is not terrible, but also only gives them a b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blackhawks Fire Assistant Coach Mike Kitchen

CHICAGO, IL -- GM Stan Bowman is keeping to his word about making changes, I guess. This may seem like a surprise to a lot of fans, but honestly, I can't say I'm overly surprised. Kitchen was mostly responsible for the power play and penalty-killing units. It's not an exaggeration to suggest that both units were more than disappointing this season--especially when it really mattered and they needed to be strong. But, Kitchen was a good assistant coach. He saw the last two Stanley Cups with the Blackhawks, starting after the 2009-2010 season with the Hawks. Up until this year, the penalty killing and power play has been stellar--but, obviously something changed. Still, I'm not sure anyone expected Bowman to make changes this quickly, or in this fashion. I think this likely sets the stage for what to expect this summer, which could be shocking to some fans this summer. I'm not even entirely sure who is safe on the roster or coaching staff (except Coach Q, w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Measuring the Blackhawks Rookies and Newbies

CHICAGO, IL -- I know I did a quick measure of the entire Blackhawks roster back in February, but I thought since the season is likely coming to a close (save for a miracle), it might be nice to get an idea of where the newbies and rookies to the Hawks roster are. For this article, I did create some guidelines, like I did with the mid-season report cards (end of season report cards are coming soon, by the way!). This isn't really going to be a report card, but more of just my general thoughts on how the player is doing in his first season with the Hawks--I'll give a more specific/"graded" report in the post-season report cards article. The basic guidelines are as follows: Must be currently on the Hawks roster (not in Rockford) Must have played less than 82 NHL games OR less than 82 games with the Blackhawks (all stats will be just for this season to make things easy) Must be their first full year playing with the Blackhawks With that out of...
Post a Comment
Read more