Skip to main content

Artemi Panarin Races for the Calder


CHICAGO, IL -- I got the notification during my noon class.

"Artemi Panarin has been named the NHL's First Star of the week after posting 8 points (3G, 5A) in 3 games."

What a crazy thing to think that this rookie (though I've heard he doesn't quite enjoy being called one) from the KHL could meld so quickly with his almost comically similar linemate, Patrick Kane, and another newbie to the team (and also Russian), center Artem Anisimov.

He's had a really incredible season thus far, so when people say he doesn't deserve the Calder, I scratch my head a little.

Is it the age thing? NHL says he's a rookie, so I'll take their word for it.

Is it the fact that he's played for another hockey league? NHL doesn't recognize it as a professional league.

Is it the fact that he plays on a line with Patrick Kane? Well, you do want to put players with chemistry and similar game play on the same line.

Sure, he had a nine-game scoring drought, but let's be honest: March wasn't the highlight of the season at all for the Blackhawks.

But, he's picking up at the point in the season when the team needs him to the most.

He's leading the rookies in goals, assists, and points (28-44--72), and in each of those categories, he's leading by a fair amount. He leads rookies in points by 20, the next runner-up being Eichel with 52. Panarin's three-game run has been a good one, putting him that much further in front of his competition. And, this isn't even his first 'First Star of the Week'--in fact, it's his third on the season, which is pretty impressive.

Remember, too, that this is really the first time in a while that Patrick Kane has had a solid line to play on. The second line hasn't changed much this season aside from when Panarin or Anisimov were sick or out with injuries. They've also done the most scoring for the Blackhawks this season, which helped them in the early part of the season to maintain an upper seed in the standings. It's what helped make March less dreadful.

The thing that bites the most about this is that people refuse to even suggest he could be a nominee for the Calder Trophy. Now, I'm slightly biased, but... what?

With that impressive of a rookie season in the NHL, he's deserving of the trophy. He's the first to tally 72 points in a rookie season for the Blackhawks since his twin, Patrick Kane, did it in 2007-08. He's also the first rookie to post consecutive four-point games for the Blackhawks. Ever.

Now, people will have their opinions about all of this, and that's fine. But, if you're discrediting the hard work he's put in this season because of his age, or because he plays for a good team, or because he's on a line with Patrick Kane, you need to take a step back and look at the stats.

If for one second you think someone else is more deserving of this trophy than Panarin, well... I don't know what to tell you.

The evidence for him is pretty damning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Like This Team, You Might Like... (Part II)

RALEIGH, NC -- Here's the second part to my 'If You Like This Team..." series! Same rules apply, and sound off in the comments if you agree or have other ideas! If you like the LA Kings, you might like... the Pittsburgh Penguins! This one was actually one of the first ones I thought of--the teams seem to kind of be two sides of the same coin. Both teams have a clear winning culture in the past ten or so years (the Penguins have won the Cup in 2009/2016/2017, and the Kings won in 2012/2014), and because of that, most fans don't like either team, or are just sick of seeing them win. However, both teams are also kind of struggling with older core groups of players, and both are likely going to start rebuilding a little over the summer. Even though the Penguins made it to the playoffs this season, with a sweep by the New York Islanders, it's clear something's not quite right with that team, and it'll be interesting to see what the organization deci

Checking In - Breaking Down the Blackhawks' Play Over a Month

CHICAGO, IL — I’m going to be absolutely real with you—I had no idea what to write about for the blog this week. I’ve written about the Blackhawks being good, bad, and everything in between, I’ve written about Patrick Kane a couple times now (#Kane4Hart), and I’ve even written about the best goal celebrations from the Hawks this season. The idea tank is running dry, my friends. So, I thought we could throw it back to a post I made a while back about what the Hawks really needed to do to make the playoffs, and grade them on how well they're meeting all three of those items a couple of weeks later. Let's just get right on into it, shall we? 1) With 27 games left, you have to go 18-9 to get to the 88-90-point range that would potentially get them into the playoffs. So, the Hawks currently sit at 71 points through 70 games, and since the date of this article (February 8th), the Hawks have gone 9-6, which is not terrible, but also only gives them a b

Out for the Count - Blackhawks Miss Playoffs for Second Straight Season

CHICAGO, IL -- Well, we've reached the end of the road, boys. If you haven't heard, the Blackhawks were eliminated from playoff contention with the Colorado Avalanche's win over the Oilers on Tuesday. I'm not going to lie, it's been a fun season. There have been definite highs and lows this season, and at the end of the day, the Hawks are ending on a higher note than they expected to. This season really has been a whirlwind for this team--there was a relatively big group of new guys at the start of the season (Brandon Manning, Chris Kunitz, Cam Ward, Henri Jokiharju, Andreas Martinsen, to name a few), and while some of them didn't stick around, they all left a mark on the team--good or bad, that's for you to decide. Coach Quenneville was fired fairly abruptly in the midst of what would be an eight-game losing streak in early November, and the Hawks brought in rookie coach Jeremy Colliton to replace him. Colliton really has grown on me this season