Skip to main content

A Lucky Shot In OT Caused a Loss in Game 1--But, the Hawks Aren't Done Yet



ST. LOUIS, MO -- That game had me biting my nails like crazy last night. And I don't often chew on my nails at all.

 It didn't help that the game was a 9:30pm EST start, and I feared from the start that the game would go into OT. If only I'd known.

 I thought the Blackhawks played some damn good hockey last night. The defense finally looked good and they managed to kill four penalties. The Hawks couldn't seem to capitalize on any of their power plays, but to be fair, Elliot is like a damn brick wall. Crawford was, too. Last night was a battle of the goalies, honestly.

 I thought the Blackhawks did have a lot of good opportunities to score, and yes, as usual, I would have loved for them to shoot the puck more. For some reason, they seemed to pass it a lot last night. The passes were often complete, but nothing came of them.

 As far as stellar players, I thought Toews played incredibly last night. Ladd did as well, despite his distraction earlier in the day (congrats to him and his wife!). The top line accounted for most of the SOG, which was incredibly impressive. 35 shots to St. Louis' 18 is pretty impressive as well. I think they're going to kick it into gear on Friday and maybe rip the Blues a new one.

 I was pleased with how little fighting there was. It was clear from the get-go that the Blues were going to play physically, but the Blackhawks luckily were able to keep their cool and just play hockey. I'm sorry, Blues, but you're not going to win the series with hits. Or, luck, for that matter.

 The goal in OT was a fluke. And, I'm not saying that because I'm biased--it literally went off of van Riemsdyk's skate. It wasn't anything incredible or jaw-dropping. Just frustrating.

 But, like I said about their hits, the Blues can't expect to win with just sheer luck. Not against a team that's seasoned in the playoffs. And, the Hawks did play exceptionally well last night. St. Louis had a lot of chances to make plays, but the Blackhawks took them back down the ice and forced them to defend.

 I think this series very well could go to Game 7. I think most of us would prefer for it not to, but these two teams are pretty evenly matched. Last night felt like a Stanley Cup Finals game.

 But, the Hawks have a lot on their side going into Friday's game. Duncan Keith is coming back from his six-game suspension, and won't mess around with the Blues' physicality. He won't take it. Crawford was great last night, and I have complete faith that he'll be just as good on Friday night. I think the Blackhawks are frustrated more than anything with the loss last night, so they might be a little angry, too.

 I think they've got a lot of things in their favor, so it'll be really interesting to see how the rest of the series plays out.

 The Blackhawks stay in St. Louis Friday night, and the puck drops at 8pm. The game will be aired on NBCSN.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Checking In - Breaking Down the Blackhawks' Play Over a Month

CHICAGO, IL — I’m going to be absolutely real with you—I had no idea what to write about for the blog this week. I’ve written about the Blackhawks being good, bad, and everything in between, I’ve written about Patrick Kane a couple times now (#Kane4Hart), and I’ve even written about the best goal celebrations from the Hawks this season. The idea tank is running dry, my friends. So, I thought we could throw it back to a post I made a while back about what the Hawks really needed to do to make the playoffs, and grade them on how well they're meeting all three of those items a couple of weeks later. Let's just get right on into it, shall we? 1) With 27 games left, you have to go 18-9 to get to the 88-90-point range that would potentially get them into the playoffs. So, the Hawks currently sit at 71 points through 70 games, and since the date of this article (February 8th), the Hawks have gone 9-6, which is not terrible, but also only gives them a b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Blackhawks Fire Assistant Coach Mike Kitchen

CHICAGO, IL -- GM Stan Bowman is keeping to his word about making changes, I guess. This may seem like a surprise to a lot of fans, but honestly, I can't say I'm overly surprised. Kitchen was mostly responsible for the power play and penalty-killing units. It's not an exaggeration to suggest that both units were more than disappointing this season--especially when it really mattered and they needed to be strong. But, Kitchen was a good assistant coach. He saw the last two Stanley Cups with the Blackhawks, starting after the 2009-2010 season with the Hawks. Up until this year, the penalty killing and power play has been stellar--but, obviously something changed. Still, I'm not sure anyone expected Bowman to make changes this quickly, or in this fashion. I think this likely sets the stage for what to expect this summer, which could be shocking to some fans this summer. I'm not even entirely sure who is safe on the roster or coaching staff (except Coach Q, w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Measuring the Blackhawks Rookies and Newbies

CHICAGO, IL -- I know I did a quick measure of the entire Blackhawks roster back in February, but I thought since the season is likely coming to a close (save for a miracle), it might be nice to get an idea of where the newbies and rookies to the Hawks roster are. For this article, I did create some guidelines, like I did with the mid-season report cards (end of season report cards are coming soon, by the way!). This isn't really going to be a report card, but more of just my general thoughts on how the player is doing in his first season with the Hawks--I'll give a more specific/"graded" report in the post-season report cards article. The basic guidelines are as follows: Must be currently on the Hawks roster (not in Rockford) Must have played less than 82 NHL games OR less than 82 games with the Blackhawks (all stats will be just for this season to make things easy) Must be their first full year playing with the Blackhawks With that out of...
Post a Comment
Read more